FHSumBench: Evaluating LLMs’ Assessment of Mixed-Context Hallucination Through the Lens of Summarization

Project Overview

FHSumBench is a research project focused on evaluating how large language models assess mixed-context hallucination through summarization tasks. The project provides a novel framework for understanding LLMs’ self-assessment capabilities and their limitations in detecting hallucination patterns.

Research Focus

Mixed-Context Analysis

• Conflicting Information: Evaluates how LLMs handle scenarios with contradictory information in source materials
• Context Integration: Studies how models process and reconcile mixed or ambiguous contexts
• Decision Making: Analyzes LLM reasoning processes when faced with conflicting data

Self-Assessment Capabilities

• Self-Evaluation: Tests LLMs’ ability to detect their own hallucination patterns
• Confidence Calibration: Examines how well models can assess their own reliability
• Error Recognition: Studies models’ capacity to identify when they generate false information

Summarization Framework

• Task-Specific Evaluation: Uses summarization as a controlled environment for hallucination study
• Structured Assessment: Provides systematic approach to evaluating hallucination detection
• Benchmark Creation: Establishes new standards for mixed-context hallucination evaluation

Key Contributions

Novel Dataset

• Mixed-Context Scenarios: Carefully constructed datasets with conflicting information
• Diverse Domains: Covers multiple subject areas and information types
• Annotated Examples: Human-verified ground truth for evaluation

Evaluation Framework

• Systematic Assessment: Structured methodology for evaluating LLM performance
• Multiple Metrics: Comprehensive evaluation using various assessment criteria
• Comparative Analysis: Framework for comparing different models and approaches

Research Insights

• Limitation Identification: Reveals specific weaknesses in current LLM architectures
• Improvement Directions: Provides guidance for future model development
• Methodology Validation: Confirms effectiveness of summarization-based evaluation

Technical Approach

Dataset Construction

• Source Selection: Identifies appropriate source materials with potential conflicts
• Conflict Introduction: Systematically introduces contradictory information
• Quality Control: Ensures dataset quality through human verification

Evaluation Methodology

• Controlled Experiments: Structured testing of LLM capabilities
• Multi-Model Comparison: Evaluates various language model architectures
• Statistical Analysis: Rigorous statistical evaluation of results

Analysis Framework

• Pattern Recognition: Identifies common hallucination patterns
• Error Classification: Categorizes different types of hallucination errors
• Performance Metrics: Quantifies model performance across different scenarios

Research Impact

Academic Contributions

• Novel Methodology: Introduces new approach to hallucination evaluation
• Benchmark Establishment: Creates standard for mixed-context evaluation
• Literature Contribution: Advances understanding of LLM limitations

Practical Applications

• Model Development: Guides improvement of language model architectures
• Quality Assurance: Helps develop better evaluation tools for AI systems
• Industry Standards: Contributes to establishment of evaluation benchmarks

Community Impact

• Open Source: Provides code and data for community use
• Reproducible Research: Enables other researchers to build upon findings
• Educational Resource: Serves as learning material for students and practitioners

Project Status

Active Research - Ongoing development with plans for expanded dataset and evaluation framework.

Technologies Used

• Python: Primary programming language for implementation
• PyTorch: Deep learning framework for model evaluation
• Transformers: State-of-the-art NLP models and libraries
• Statistical Analysis: Tools for rigorous evaluation and analysis

Future Directions

• Expanded Dataset: Development of larger and more diverse mixed-context datasets
• Multi-Modal Extension: Extension to include visual and audio content
• Real-Time Evaluation: Development of real-time hallucination detection tools
• Industry Integration: Adaptation for commercial AI system evaluation

Recommended citation: S Qi, R Cao, Y He, Z Yuan. (2025). "Evaluating LLMs Assessment of Mixed-Context Hallucination Through the Lens of Summarization." arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.01670.
Download Paper